[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:06:09 +0200 |
> From: Harald Maier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:33:50 +0100
> >
> > I tried it too and I found too that something goes wrong. 'emacs -q'
> > works fine, but when I tried to load my .emacs it displays the 'Emacs
> > Abort Dialog' and complains that 'A fatal error has occured!'
>
> I did some additional tests and it looks that the problem occurs only
> if emacs-21.3 is compiled with a latest cygwin gcc. I did two test
> with the emacs-21.3.tar.gz from March last year and the actual tarball
> from ftp.gnu.org. On both sources the same happens, so it does not
> look that something has changed since the compromise of the server.
> Afterwards I compiled emacs with MSVC and the result is that all works
> as expected. Currently I have no clue why the problem with gcc
> happens.
What version of GCC is the one that produces a bad binary? What does
"gcc --version" says?
Can someone run Emacs under GDB and see where exactly does it abort?
One possible idea to check is to use lower level of optimizations when
building Emacs, like -O0 or -O1. Can someone see if that produces a
good binary?
- [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, David Vanderschel, 2004/02/06
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/06
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/16
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/16
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- [h-e-w] NTEmacs, producing a file of "\xff"., Bill Pringlemeir, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] NTEmacs, producing a file of "\xff"., Dr Francis J. Wright, 2004/02/18