Re: [h-e-w] (no subject)

[Jason Rumney]

address@hidden writes:

>   cygpath -m
> will generate the correct path.

Maybe so, but it will also unnecessarily complicate the makefiles
further than they already are. I don't have time to support Emacs as
it is without complicating things further just to support a version of
make that is inherently broken. I guess it is up to Andrew Innes
whether he considers it worth installing any change you come up with.

> lisp/makefile needs to fix the "lisp" 
> variable.  I'm trying to make this work now.   I'm a little shaky on
> my make syntax. 

> In a message dated 11/6/2002 2:24:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, address@hidden 
> writes:
> 
> > address@hidden writes:
> > 
> > > This, of course, is a bug in the emacs distribution.
> > 
> > How is it a bug in the Emacs distribution that Cygwin make does not
> > generate valid Windows paths?