|
From: | Peter Davis |
Subject: | Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone? |
Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:42:28 -0500 |
At 05:31 PM 12/20/2001, Robert Praetorius wrote:
> From what I've heard, the mutt included with cygwin is not the most > up-to-date or complete.Since I follow (well, receive and skim) the cygwin mailing list and was the one casting indirect aspersions at mutt on cygwin and am both a cygwin and a mutt user. . .the current beta mutt is 1.3.24 (see http://www.mutt.org/ ). People report being able to build this on cygwin and it running well, but I recall people saying it can't be built OOTB the current cygwin distribution (see http://www.cygwin.com/packages/ ) has both mutt-1.2.5i-5 and mutt-1.2.5i-6 (not sure what the differences are) the cygwin mailing list archives (see http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acygwin.com+mutt ) contain numerous comments, many commenting on problems with binary attachments and whether they are or aren't solved by this or that.
There's also unixmail, a bundle that includes fetchmail, mutt, aspell/pspell, sSMTP, and GnuPG. This is available on SourceForge. However, I have not been able to get the self-extracting .bat file to run on either Win NT or Win 2000. I'm not sure what version of mutt's supposed to be in this.
p.s.: does anybody else remember Emacs' ancestor, ^R mode? http://zane.brouhaha.com/~healyzh/_teco_/tecord.1132
Sure. In fact, I remember writing whole applications as teco macros. I was on one project where we had to redesign some reports generated from a database. Rather than re-code and test the reporting application on short notice, we write teco macros to read the reports, move columns around, etc. Saved our necks more than once.
-pd -------- Peter Davis Funny stuff at http://www.pfdstudio.com "The artwork formerly shown as prints." Resources for children's writers & illustrators: http://www.pfdstudio.com/cwrl.html
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |