[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Submitter Email?
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Submitter Email? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:57:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Bob Proulx wrote:
>> The MFT header is added to the cc to the bug-list that goes out when a
>> report is closed by sending a mail to 123-done. It is not added to
>> any-and-all mails, because there is no need.
>
> I disagree. The MFT header is needed in both cases.
I disagree with your disagreement. :)
Just follow the normal GNU mailing list conventions of using
reply-to-all, and everything will be fine. The addition of
debbugs.gnu.org into the system does not change anything.
The MFT is only needed with the -done messages that close bugs, because
they mess around with the recipients.
You're effectively saying "all lists.gnu.org mail should set MFT", which
is not something I agree with. There's no point setting an MFT that just
points to all the recipients.
> One feature the Debian BTS has that the GNU BTS does not have is the
> ability to subscribe to bugs. Or have I missed seeing that feature in
> the GNU BTS?
No, it's not supported. I see no prospect of me implementing it, sorry.
But if someone wants to, that would be great.
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5439
> Please may I request a MFT header be added to messages sent to the GNU
> BTS as an enhancement request?
Sorry, I'm not going to do that.
Everyone should just follow the normal lists.gnu.org convention of not
assuming people are subscribed, and use reply-to-all, and everything
works fine.
(And let's face it, MFT isn't a magic bullet; and the people who reply
to me off-list by mistake are always using dumb mail clients that don't
respect it anyway.)