[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:41:44 +0200 |
Actually it does repeat messages once per day even if the output is the
same. That is to avoid spamming admins with persistent problems. Reports
go into outputs though.
Don't know why this is not aparently docuemnted. I have not understood
David's problem with outputs. Works fine for me.
M
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 12:30 -0600, Ed Brown wrote:
> > > Also, cfexecd doesn't send any mail unless the output
> > > differs from the previous run,
>
> > Hmmm. Is the fact that cfexecd doesn't send any mail unless the output
> > differs documented somewhere?
>
> Wow, thanks for spelling this out! No, I don't think it is documented,
> and I can't remember it being mentioned here before (though it could
> have gone by unnoticed).
>
> Usually no mail from cfengine is a Good Thing, but lately I've also been
> trying to use 'alerts:' and been frustrated about the seemingly
> inconsistent results. A lot of pieces just fell into place.
>
> And thanks for the $(date) suggested workaround.
>
> -Ed
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
- No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, David Masterson, 2005/10/11
- RE: No reliable outputs in 2.1.15 ?, Martin, Jason H, 2005/10/11