[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning (was Re: DSM & Study #2 Introduction)
From: |
William L. Jarrold |
Subject: |
[Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning (was Re: DSM & Study #2 Introduction) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:17:39 -0600 (CST) |
See below...
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:30:31AM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> > Now, here's what I've been thinking of late.
> >
> > For the near future (now to maybe 3-6 months) We should have *two* front
> > pages. One front page (e.g. openheartlogic.org/start.html) should be to
> > snag research participants. This should be written in clear very short
> > english text easy for a grandmother to understand. It should also
> > motivate our work and emphasize the benefit to afflicated populations.
> >
> > I think the text you wrote should go on the front page for them. I.e....
> > [...snip...]
> >
> > ...maybe even make it shorter. Whatever. Then *RIGHT* after that say,
> > well, PLEASE participate in our research. Press <hotlinke: here> to
> > start.
> >
> > ....And that's IT. No other hotlinks to distract/confuse them. We want
> > them to do the survey. Once they do the stupid start survey, then we open
> > up many possibilities to them. One of which is the other "create your own
> > vinette" type survey.
> >
> > (Ooops, sorry, I'm gonna sorta repeat myself)...
> >
> > Also, one should not even have the option of going the "make your own
> > vinette" until either (1) one has participated in the replication study
> > or (2) we have run enough (e.g. 90) subjects through the replication.
>
> I've reorganized the screens.
>
> Now I'm going to test it and type as I go.
>
> 1. I found the welcome screen. There is a short introduction. Then
> it says "please participate ..." There are two links in the corner:
> Login and About (which I am going to ignore).
>
> 2. I am on the Expert Registration page. I enter my info and agree to
> Informed Consent.
>
> 3. My account is created but now I have to wait for the confirmation
> email.
>
> 4. I received the email. After I paste the link in the email then my
> account is activated. I am clicking on the "login" link. (Oops, that
> link didn't work. A bug! Squash it! OK, that's better. 3 cheers
> for testing.)
>
> 5. I enter my login & password and click the button.
Question: Am I being too paranoid to not endorse this...
Remember Me -- Store your login information in a cookie on your machine
for a year. Enable this option only if you are using your own computer.
...I don't trust netscape/mozilla security much more than M$. Therefore
I don't want to put passwords on cookies. Is this reasoning sound or
overly paranoid?
>
> 6. Now I am asked about my diagnosis. Hrm. This is a funny question.
> I don't even know what "Autism" _is_ so I guess I'll just click the
> Continue link at the bottom.
The disparity btwn [change] button vs the <continue> hotlink is a little
confusing. Any ideas on making them more the same?
>
> 7. I arrive at "Study 1 - Introduction". There is a picture of a
> human heart -- disgusting -- but there is also a cute robot.
I grinned a great big grin when I saw these.
> OK, I
> read through the introduction and click on the Proceed link.
Hrm, am I supposed to fill in the Scenario Examples 1 and 2? (You
might want to add fine print saying, "You don't *have* to answer
this, it is just an example but feel free to practice if you want.").
Also, minor typo in Scenario Example 2...
Feeling:} Sad.
...send the } to /dev/null.
>
> 8. Here is the first "Rate Believability" screen.
>
> + + +
>
> OK, that's 8 clicks. Is it too much?
I dunno. Sure, why not. Let's ask friendly folks for their
opnions. I'll start asking some more folks. I'll cc you or
forward. Nudge me if I am laggard.
Hrm, I think it will take people lots of guts to push through on this
survey. Everyone is in instant gratification mode while online. Maybe
there are a few highly dedicated parents of children w/autism out there?
>
> I deleted your account so you can try it.
Thanks. I have updated my address file and have updated the bookmark.
Gotta run.
This is A W E S O M E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Bill
>
> --
> A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://openheartlogic.org
>
[Heartlogic-dev] researchy intro (was Re: DSM & Study #2 Introduction), Joshua N Pritikin, 2004/01/24
[Heartlogic-dev] Re: researchy intro (was Re: DSM & Study #2 Introduction), William L. Jarrold, 2004/01/29