|
From: | Marc Murray |
Subject: | Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required |
Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2015 08:20:49 -0500 |
Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the term "sex" for "gender" in the person (party) model.
The boolean proposal is semantically the same as mine to add a new optionAnd I agree with what Cedric said here.
"Unknown" except that my solution doesn't add an extra field which should be
tested all over the code before using the sex field.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |