[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart
From: |
Pierre de Buyl |
Subject: |
Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:36:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> With regard to the boundary attribute of the box group, I have the
> impression that a value of “open”, or “open” and “closed”, would give
> rise to many differing interpretations.
>
> As an unambiguous definition of “boundary”, I suggest to use the
> values “periodic“ and “nonperiodic” in the first H5MD release.
> “nonperiodic” conveys exactly the intended meaning.
In continuation of the latest efforts to minimize ambiguity in the choice of
names, "nonperiodic" and "periodic" seem perfect.
Pierre
- [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Pierre de Buyl, 2013/07/17
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Pierre de Buyl, 2013/07/17
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Peter Colberg, 2013/07/17
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Pierre de Buyl, 2013/07/21
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Peter Colberg, 2013/07/21
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Pierre de Buyl, 2013/07/22
- Re: [h5md-user] Update on H5MD from Stuttgart, Peter Colberg, 2013/07/24