[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/pointers PROBLEMS article.rst

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Branch:         
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/11/06 10:23:26

Modified files:
        pointers       : PROBLEMS article.rst 

Log message:
        twids

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/pointers/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.167&tr2=1.168&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS
diff -u manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS:1.1 manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS:1.2
--- manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS:1.1   Thu Nov  6 08:01:48 2003
+++ manuscripts/pointers/PROBLEMS       Thu Nov  6 10:23:26 2003
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-Abstract: 
-
-    - why filesharing as the comparison
-
-    - wrong referent for which
-
-
-
-
Index: manuscripts/pointers/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/pointers/article.rst:1.167 
manuscripts/pointers/article.rst:1.168
--- manuscripts/pointers/article.rst:1.167      Thu Nov  6 10:18:50 2003
+++ manuscripts/pointers/article.rst    Thu Nov  6 10:23:26 2003
@@ -97,14 +97,14 @@
 
 If the Web worked like a filesharing system, there would be
 no central point of failure for a web page; a page could be downloaded
-from any host that has a copy. This would save bandwidth
+from any host with a copy. This would save bandwidth
 and increase availability; pages would stay online as long as
 any user keeps a copy of them on their local harddisk.
 Files could be
 linked using  permanent URIs based on the files' cryptographic 
 hashes, as in [freenet-ieee-andalso-edonkey2kurl]_.
-However, if the Web worked like
-a filesharing system, web pages could not be updated;
+However, if the Web worked this way,
+web pages could not be updated;
 a new version of a web page would have a different hash,
 and thus a different URI. [#update]_