gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] journals benja


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: [Gzz-commits] journals benja
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:47:14 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/fenfire
Module name:    journals
Branch:         
Changes by:     Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>      03/07/06 21:47:14

Modified files:
        .              : benja 

Log message:
        tday

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/fenfire/journals/benja.diff?tr1=1.76&tr2=1.77&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: journals/benja
diff -u journals/benja:1.76 journals/benja:1.77
--- journals/benja:1.76 Sat Jul  5 20:56:37 2003
+++ journals/benja      Sun Jul  6 21:47:14 2003
@@ -47,6 +47,23 @@
 Past:
 -----
 
+2003-07-06 [7h, 14.30-16.00, 16.15-17.45, 18.45-19.45, 20.00-22.30, 2.00-3.30]:
+
+- mail
+- think about Storm references & pointers
+- read Surety timestamping patents (<http://www.surety.com>).
+  timestamping will likely be *very* important
+  to Storm... :-(
+- read about how the simplest form of timestamping,
+  which Surety also claims, is free: they've lost
+  a lawsuit against Entrust, who were leading (say they)
+  IETF standardization of the technique:
+  <http://www.entrust.com/news/files/11_09_99_258.htm>
+- however, it appears that the forms of timestamping
+  under consideration there require a trusted third party--
+  trusted enough that it can backdate documents! bad bad...
+- answer Matti's and Asko's answers to my PEG
+
 2003-07-05 [5.25h, 15.30-18.00, 22.00-22.45, 23.30-1.30]:
 
 - read about XPackage (http://www.xpackage.org)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]