gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst


From: Hermanni Hyytiälä
Subject: [Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 04:33:10 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/storm
Module name:    storm
Branch:         
Changes by:     Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/06/06 04:33:10

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah: peg.rst 

Log message:
        better abstract

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/storm/storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.6&tr2=1.7&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst
diff -u storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.6 
storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.7
--- storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.6      Fri Jun  6 
04:27:53 2003
+++ storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst  Fri Jun  6 04:33:10 2003
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 
 :Authors:  Hermanni Hyytiälä
 :Date-Created: 2003-06-05
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/06 08:27:53 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.6 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/06 08:33:10 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.7 $
 :Status:   Incomplete
 
 .. :Stakeholders:
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
 In this document we mean with "peer" as an entity which is able to do a 
 (limited/simplified/modified) number of regular GISP peer's functionalies
 in a way which may be harmful for the GISP network w.r.t. performance
-and redundancy.
+and redundancy. The harmfulness of a peer be a consequence of the fact
+that a peer is faulty, or a peer is wilfully malicious. 
 
 Disclaimer
 ==========
@@ -35,16 +36,16 @@
 For determining whether GISP is resilient against hostile attack, 
 we want the answers to the following questions:
 
+- Does GISP have *obvious* exploits ?
+
+- If there are exlpoits, how easily they can be used by an 
+  hostile peer ? 
+
 - Is GISP resilient against (hostile) attacks or not ?
 
 - How severe implications attacks may cause ?
 
 - How well GISP is able to re-organise after a (hostile) attack ?
-
-- Does GISP have *obvious* exploits ?
-
-- If there are exlpoits, how easily they can be used by an 
-  hostile peer ? 
 
 Simulation method
 ==================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]