[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/UMLLink short-paper.rst

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/05/26 09:23:52

Modified files:
        UMLLink        : short-paper.rst 

Log message:
        rewriteexper

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst.diff?tr1=1.35&tr2=1.36&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst
diff -u manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst:1.35 
manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst:1.36
--- manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst:1.35    Fri May 23 08:24:11 2003
+++ manuscripts/UMLLink/short-paper.rst Mon May 26 09:23:51 2003
@@ -362,18 +362,21 @@
 ===========
 
 The statistics of our project's WWW server show that diagrams
-connecting javadoc to design documentationg have significantly
-increased the usage of project's design documentation and traversing
-between documentation levels. Altough, we couldn't distuinguish usage
-of design documentation's or javadoc's internal navigation from usage
-of imagemapped diagrams, we could track the usage of diagrams, when
-browsing between design documentation and javadoc.
-
+connecting javadoc to design documentationg have been used
+for traversing
+between the documentation levels. 
 In the period of three months (Jan 03 till end of Mar 03) 9% of all
 design documentation page request came by traversing from javadoc to
 design documentation via diagrams. On the other hand 11% of all
 javadoc visits came from design documentation using imagemapped
 diagrams. 
+Unfortunately, the HTTP server logs did not allow us to 
+distinguish the use of the UML diagrams for navigation
+from one javadoc page to another or from one design document
+to another so we have no data on that --- we expect the number
+would be even higher.
+
+Anecdotally XXX
 
 .. , how much usage of UML diagrams
    as spatial menus replace usage of documentation's internal navigation.