gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Sigs article.rst


From: Tuomas J. Lukka
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Sigs article.rst
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 07:45:44 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/05/17 07:45:44

Modified files:
        Sigs           : article.rst 

Log message:
        edit

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.2&tr2=1.3&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.2 manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.3
--- manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst:1.2    Sat May 17 07:39:00 2003
+++ manuscripts/Sigs/article.rst        Sat May 17 07:45:44 2003
@@ -95,12 +95,8 @@
 
 Despite the limitation to a small number of signatures
 per public/private key pair, one-time signatures have
-two distinct advantages. Firstly, one-way functions
-can be very fast, and operations on one-way signatures
-may be orders of magnitude faster than operations
-in schemes like DSA or RSA.
-
-Secondly, one-way functions generally do not rely on
+an important advantage: 
+one-way functions generally do not rely on
 unproven number-theoretic assumptions, like the
 difficulty of factoring large integers [XXX]. In practice,
 a cryptographic hash function is used in most
@@ -109,6 +105,10 @@
 cryptographic hash functions are one-way, also using them
 as the basis for signature avoids introducing additional
 cryptographic primitives into the system.
+
+Additionally, operations on one-way signatures
+may be orders of magnitude faster than operations
+in schemes like DSA or RSA.
 
 In this article, we introduce a new signature scheme
 that can be used any number of times without keeping track




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]