[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/03/20 09:16:19

Modified files:
        Paper          : paper.tex 

Log message:
        Readability discussion, split and give some to jvk

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.39&tr2=1.40&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.39 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.40
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.39    Thu Mar 20 09:13:49 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Thu Mar 20 09:16:19 2003
@@ -1051,29 +1051,9 @@
 
 \section{Experiences, evaluation}
 
-\subsection{Text readability}
-
-XXX: http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-6-4-81
-% "Background variation effects were only seen when the text contrast was low"
-% "[...] several studies have indicated that there is a low correlation between
-%  subjective preference for text displays and empirical measures of their
-%  readability."
-
-TJL
-
-It can be argued that
-the backgrounds clutter the display
-visually, making the user interface more confusing,
-and reduce text readability.
-
-Indeed, one of the most difficult aspects of the work was making the random
-color selection produce acceptable results.
+\section{Overall appearance of the resulting textures}
 
-Text readability on the generated backgrounds depends 
-strongly on the text scale; making it easy for the user to zoom
-fluidly in and out helps.
-
-In the current version, even small text is quite legible on the backgrounds.
+JVK
 
 We have not tried to attain infinite zoomability\cite{furnas00infinity}
 with the current implementation,
@@ -1099,6 +1079,29 @@
 equations.
 However, in the intended zooming range 
 the current system is quite satisfactory.
+
+\subsection{Text readability}
+
+XXX: http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-6-4-81
+% "Background variation effects were only seen when the text contrast was low"
+% "[...] several studies have indicated that there is a low correlation between
+%  subjective preference for text displays and empirical measures of their
+%  readability."
+
+TJL
+
+It can be argued that
+the backgrounds clutter the display
+visually, making the user interface more confusing,
+and reduce text readability.
+Indeed, one of the most difficult aspects of this work was tuning the random
+color selection to produce acceptable results.
+
+Text readability on the generated backgrounds depends 
+strongly on the text scale; making it easy for the user to zoom
+fluidly in and out helps.
+
+% In the current version, even small text is quite legible on the backgrounds.
 
 % It is important that the background can be zoomed 
 % to different resolutions.