[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:29:15 +0100 |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 12:46, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
> > By inputs, do you mean data-inputs and package-inputs?
>
> Data inputs only.
I understand that only the input files need to be part of the input hash.
However, I do not know if the output hash need to also contain the
tool hash and the input hash.
Therefore, when chaining (an input is another output), the store
should track the tools used, somehow.
Maybe, it is what you are explaining with the quote: "we just hash the
inputs leading up to the output, excluding the output itself".
Right?
--
simon
- [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/28
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/29
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, zimoun, 2019/01/29
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/29
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers,
zimoun <=
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/30
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, zimoun, 2019/01/29
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/29
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, zimoun, 2019/01/30
- Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/30
Re: [gwl-devel] support for containers, zimoun, 2019/01/29