[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#69424] (No Subject)
From: |
Jiwei YANG |
Subject: |
[bug#69424] (No Subject) |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:19:41 +0000 |
Thanks! For font-google-noto-sans-cjk and font-google-noto-serif-cjk, will it be good to use "Super OTC" fonts? In my case, LibreOffice (flatpak version) was unable to recognize "Super OTC" edition but it is fixed now. There may still be some compatibility problems that I have not noticed.
publickey - yangjiwei@protonmail.com - 0xF13E1C55.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 2/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Prefer variable fonts and split outputs., (continued)
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 2/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Prefer variable fonts and split outputs., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 4/5] gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 3/5] gnu: font-google-noto-emoji: Update to 2.042., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 5/5] gnu: font-google-noto-serif-cjk: Update to 2.002., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 0/5] Update Noto fonts and switch them to variable fonts (77% size reduced)., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 4/5] gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 5/5] gnu: font-google-noto-serif-cjk: Update to 2.002., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 3/5] gnu: font-google-noto-emoji: Update to 2.042., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 1/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Update to 24.2.1., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 2/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Prefer variable fonts and split outputs., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] (No Subject),
Jiwei YANG <=