[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#62246] [PATCH] doc: Add a reference to a page explaining consensus
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
[bug#62246] [PATCH] doc: Add a reference to a page explaining consensus decision making. |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:58:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Florian,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> writes:
> Hi Maxim and all.
>
> Maxim added to doc/contributing.texi:
>> It is expected from all contributors, and even more so from
>> committers, to collaborate in a consensus decision making
>> fashion. To learn what consensus decision making means and
>> understand its finer details, you are encouraged to read
>> @url{https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus}.
>
> Only now, that it is already pushed, have I taken the time to read
> (or, at some point, skim) the link.
>
> I just want to acclaim:
>
> * I agree with the addition of this kind of writing.
>
> * Seeds for Change is more politically left than I first expected, and
> the consensus sub-page uses not only examples that chime well with
> free software and Outreachy, but also one-sided views on issues like
> housing. Perhaps such examples will prompt dissent in the future.
>
> It would have been an option (a worse option) to add consensus
> decision making to the manual without linking to such an extensive
> text.
>
> Nonetheless, the way it is written, the manual asks for agreement
> with consensus decision making, not with Seeds for Change or the
> examples on the consensus page. I still agree with making people
> learn from the link.
>
> * It is good that, when there is little feedback, you have pushed it.
> Seeds for Change say: take “sufficient time”, but IMHO you did and
> more time would not have helped. Also you had already taken steps
> like writing to guix-devel and generally applied the Seeds’
> recommendations.
Glad you found it pertinent. I had read the whole thing for the first
time, and found it had useful tricks or suggestions, and was good at
clearing any misunderstandings I had about consensus decision making.
I hope others find it useful too!
--
Thanks,
Maxim