guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#61789] ‘screen-locker-service’ deprecation


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#61789] ‘screen-locker-service’ deprecation
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 23:32:14 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

Bruno Victal <mirai@makinata.eu> skribis:

> On 2023-03-03 16:45, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Bruno Victal <mirai@makinata.eu> skribis:
>> 
>>> * doc/guix.texi (X Window): Replace 'screen-locker-service' with 
>>> 'screen-locker-service-type'.
>>> Document <screen-locker-configuration>.
>>> * gnu/services/desktop.scm (desktop-services-for-system): Use 
>>> screen-locker-service-type.
>>> * gnu/services/xorg.scm: Export accessors for <screen-locker-configuration>.
>>> (<screen-locker>): Rename to ...
>>> (<screen-locker-configuration>): ... this.
>>> (<screen-locker-configuration>)[empty?]: Rename to ...
>>> (<screen-locker-configuration>)[allow-empty-password?]: ... this.
>>> (screen-locker-pam-services): Update record name.
>>> (screen-locker-setuid-programs): Update accessor name.
>>> (screen-locker-service): Deprecate procedure.
>> 
>> Also leaving this one out: there’s a bit too much going on here, and I
>> think we should discuss it separately (it’s quite different from the
>> old-style service procedures.)
>
> The changes essentially amount to a rename of the configuration record-type 
> (with backward compatibility)
> and making explicit what the 'screen-locker-service' procedure does behind 
> the scenes with 'screen-locker-service-type'.
>
> Do you have another plan in mind to split or refactor this change?

Actually no.  :-)  Just thinking we should discuss it separately because
it looks less “obvious” to me than the other patches.

Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]