[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#55424] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add back the distinction between python-ren
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
[bug#55424] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add back the distinction between python-renpy and renpy. |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:35:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.1 |
Hi,
Am Freitag, dem 17.06.2022 um 09:14 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > [...]
> > + (arguments
> > + `(#:tests? #f ; see python2-renpy
>
> The comment should mention 'python-renpy' instead, right? Also, the
> arguments could use gexps...
Thanks for catching the typo. I don't think the conversion to G-
Expressions should be in this patch, but I can follow up with a
modernization.
> And the trailing #t can be removed.
Sure.
> > [...]
> > + (inputs
> > + `(("renpy.in" ,(search-auxiliary-file "renpy/renpy.in"))
> > + ("python-renpy" ,python-renpy)
> > + ("python-tkinter" ,python "tk")
> > + ("python" ,python) ; for ‘fix-commands’ and ‘wrap’
> > + ("xdg-utils" ,xdg-utils)))
>
> Can we use new style inputs here?
Not without G-Expressions, and only if I'm allowed to inline the aux-
file into the build via #$.
Cheers