[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#53878] Fwd: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc.
From: |
Philip McGrath |
Subject: |
[bug#53878] Fwd: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc. |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 17:35:22 -0500 |
(... on this one, too)
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc.
Date: Saturday, February 19, 2022, 5:27:39 PM EST
From: Philip McGrath <philip@philipmcgrath.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Saturday, February 19, 2022 3:46:47 PM EST you wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 19.02.2022 um 01:42 -0500 schrieb Philip McGrath:
> > * gnu/packages/patches/racket-enable-scheme-backport.patch: New
> > patch.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> > * gnu/packages/chez-and-racket-bootstrap.scm (unbundle-chez-
> > submodules,
> > %racket-version, %racket-origin, racket-vm-cgc): New variables.
> > (chez-scheme)[source]<snippet>: Use 'unbundle-chez-submodules'.
>
> Something weird happened to me just now trying to build this series.
> While compiling emacs-xyz, an error was raised regarding %racket-
> version not existing and and import being missing. Assuming that you
> didn't mess up an include somewhere, there could be a cycle meaning
> we'd have to pass the version and origin by function as I originally
> said in my reply to v2.
>
> I'll clean up my work tree and try to reapply it, but that will take
> some time. Since you mentioned re-exports causing issues, I'd like to
> ask if you've made a similar experience, but the results got somehow
> hidden after the right incantations.
I haven't seen errors from emacs-xyz, but I have gotten errors about %racket-
version not existing: at the time I thought it was just a problem with
incremental rebuilds while moving back and forward through history, but,
having just refreshed my memory on more details of the cyclic issues, I think
it may be related. I'll send another email presently with details once I've
gathered references.
For now, I found that `rm gnu/packages/*.go` was enough to get `make` to
succeed again.
-Philip
-----------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc., (continued)
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 11/15] gnu: Add chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 04/15] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add utilities for Chez machine types., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 13/15] gnu: chez-mit: Support chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 14/15] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add 'chez-scheme-for-system'., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] [PATCH v3 15/15] gnu: racket: Update to 8.4., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] Fwd: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add 'chez-scheme-for-system'., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/19
[bug#53878] Fwd: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc.,
Philip McGrath <=
[bug#53878] [PATCH v4 00/15] Update Racket to 8.4. Adjust Chez Scheme packages., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 02/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Use "lib/chez-scheme" for search path., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 04/15] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add utilities for Chez machine types., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 06/15] gnu: Add stex., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 03/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Use shared zlib and lz4., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 01/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Move to (gnu packages chez-and-racket-bootstrap)., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 05/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Use new package style., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 07/15] gnu: Add chez-nanopass., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v4 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/20