[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#53820] [PATCH] gnu: Add jtdx
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
[bug#53820] [PATCH] gnu: Add jtdx |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Feb 2022 16:05:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Sheng Yang schreef op zo 06-02-2022 om 08:14 [-0600]:
> +(define jtdx-hamlib
> + ;; Fork of hamlib with custom patches used by jtdx.
Have these patches been submitted upstream? If so, can we
add a link to a web page tracking upstreaming progress,
such that we can determine when 'jdtx-hamlib' can be removed
in favour of 'hamlib'?
Given that it is a fork, doesn't the home page, synopsis and
description need to be tweaked?
Why define and not define-public?
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part