[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#48702] [PATCH v5 0/3] Add patatt and update b4
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
Subject: |
[bug#48702] [PATCH v5 0/3] Add patatt and update b4 |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 15:20:48 -0500 |
Xinglu Chen writes:
> Both packages build fine for me; b4 works as expected;
Thanks for testing.
> I haven’t gotten around to setup patatt yet, but ‘patatt --help’ works
> fine.
I haven't tested the sender's side of things (e.g., running `patatt
sign'), but I've tried out the receiving end:
* move into a clone of the patatt repo in order to make uses of its
existing .keys/ subdirectory
* pull in a message from https://lore.kernel.org for one of these keys
One example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ tree --charset=ascii .keys/openpgp
.keys/openpgp
|-- chromium.org
| `-- keescook
| `-- default
`-- linuxfoundation.org
`-- konstantin
`-- default
4 directories, 2 files
$ b4 am 20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook@chromium.org
Looking up
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook%40chromium.org
Grabbing thread from
lore.kernel.org/all/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook%40chromium.org/t.mbox.gz
Analyzing 3 messages in the thread
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✓ [PATCH] iommu: Use correctly sized arguments for bit field
+ Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> (✓ DKIM/gmail.com)
---
✓ Signed: openpgp/keescook@chromium.org
✓ Signed: DKIM/chromium.org
---
Total patches: 1
---
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook@chromium.org
Base: not specified
git am
./20211215_keescook_iommu_use_correctly_sized_arguments_for_bit_field.mbx
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
If the same `b4 am' command is invoked without those keys in place, I
instead see
✗ No key: openpgp/keescook@chromium.org
✓ Signed: DKIM/chromium.org
So, things seem to be wired up okay. (The `b4 --debug am' output for
the same command looks okay too.)
> I also took the opportunity to test the ‘guix review’ command that
> I have started to work on. :-)
Neat, thanks for the sneak peek.