guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#52578] [PATCH] updating openldap and adding service definition


From: zimoun
Subject: [bug#52578] [PATCH] updating openldap and adding service definition
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 11:53:43 +0100

Hi Maxime,

The package ’openldap’ already exists and some of your comments ask
about the existing recipe. :-)

I think Jean-François just copy/pasted the current recipe and expand it
for their own requirements: having the service they need, IIUC.


On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:39, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:

>> +        ,@(if (%current-target-system)
>> +          '("--with-yielding_select=yes"
> "ac_cv_func_memcmp_working=yes")
>> +          '()
>> +        )
>
> is this speculation on what's necessary for cross-compilation, or has
> it been determined these flags are necessary?

This bits had been added by Mathieu 1c8b1870a60de12f6c19d809522f5d8362215131.


>>+      #:make-flags '("STRIP=")
>
> Why?

This one too.

>> +        ,@(if (%current-target-system)
>> +            '(
>> +              (add-before 'make-depend 'fix-cross-gcc
>> +                (lambda* (#:key target #:allow-other-keys)
>> +                  (setenv "CC" (string-append target "-gcc"))
>> +                  #t
>> +                )
>> +              )
>> +            )
>> +            '()
>
> You can use ,(cc-for-target) here. Also, CC can be set in #:make-flags.

Again this one.


>> +    (synopsis "Implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access
> Protocol")
>> +    (description "OpenLDAP is a free implementation of the
> Lightweight Directory Access Protocol.")
>
> That's a very terse description --- is it a server, a client
> application, programming APIs for communicating with a server, or all
> of these? Also, no need to mention it's free, everything in Guix is
> free.

This description is from 2013, 2a75d4e664e802d3a3e2ed6455c63f32541559c8. ;-)


Your comments about the package itself make sense but I am not convinced
that they are related to the first Jean-François submission. :-)


Cheers,
simon





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]