[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#51307] [PATCH 0/2] guix hash: eases conversion
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#51307] [PATCH 0/2] guix hash: eases conversion |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:46:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/hash.scm (guix-hash): Allow several files.
> [directory?]: New procedure.
> [file-hash]: Catch system-error.
> [hash-to-display]: New procedure.
Nice! Could you update guix.texi and tests/guix-hash.texi?
> - (with-error-handling
> - (if (assoc-ref opts 'recursive?)
> + (if (and (assoc-ref opts 'recursive?)
> + (directory? file))
This change is not related to the main purpose of the patch.
More importantly, note that ‘--recursive’ is not limited to directories:
it preserves file properties (directory, executable, or regular), so
it’s also useful for executable files for instance. It can also be used
for regular files, even if it’s less useful.
> + (define (hash-to-display thing)
> + (match thing
> + ((? file-exists? file)
> + (fmt (file-hash file)))
> + ("-" (with-error-handling
> + (fmt (port-hash (assoc-ref opts 'hash-algorithm)
> + (current-input-port)))))
I’d swap the order of the two clauses and remove the call to
‘file-exists?’: if the file doesn’t exist, ‘file-hash’ will raise an
error.
> + (x
> + (leave (G_ "wrong argument~%")))))
> +
> + (for-each
> + (lambda (arg)
> + (format #t "~a~%" (hash-to-display arg)))
Or just (compose display hash-to-display) ?
Maybe s/hash-to-display/formatted-hash/.
Could you send an updated patch?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[bug#51307] [PATCH 0/2] guix hash: eases conversion, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/30