[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#50982] [PATCH] scripts: home/system: Don’t throw an error if no gen
From: |
Xinglu Chen |
Subject: |
[bug#50982] [PATCH] scripts: home/system: Don’t throw an error if no generations exist. |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2021 13:18:39 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 03 2021, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Xinglu Chen schreef op za 02-10-2021 om 23:05 [+0200]:
>> Previously, When running ‘guix home describe’ or ‘guix system describe’ prior
>> to having any generations, a backtrace would produced. Since not having any
>> existing generations is not an error, a warning would be enough.
>>
>> $ guix system describe
>> guix system: warning: no system generation, nothing to describe
>
> Printing a warning instead of an error to avoid a backrace isn't necessary.
> E.g., "guix show i-do-not-exists" prints an error
> ‘guix show: error: i-do-not-exist: package not found’.
>
> I suggest using (leave (G_ "bla bla")) instead of (error (G_ "bla bla"))
> for these kind of errors, it appears to work '%find-package' in (gnu
> packages).
>
> I don't know if the output of "guix system describe" and "guix home describe"
> should be an error or warning here ...
Hmm, since I don’t think that not having any generations is an error, I
would say it makes more sense to use ‘warning’ instead of ‘leave’.
‘leave’ would signal that something isn’t correct, which makes sense if
one runs ‘guix show doesnt-exist’, but not having any generations
doesn’t really mean that something is wrong.
WDYT?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature