[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#47182] [PATCH 00/18] Add support for powerpc64le-linux (wip-ppc64le
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
[bug#47182] [PATCH 00/18] Add support for powerpc64le-linux (wip-ppc64le-for-master) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:29:47 +0200 |
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:10:23PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:45:00PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> >> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (binutils-final)[arguments]: When checking
> >> if
> >> the system is a Power architecture, instead of hard-coding "powerpc-linux",
> >> use the target-powerpc? procedure so it works on more Power architectures.
> >> [inputs]: Likewise.
> >> ---
> >> gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> >> index c0732bbf62d..d4511ed9148 100644
> >> --- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> >> +++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> >> @@ -3516,14 +3516,14 @@ exec ~a/bin/~a-~a -B~a/lib -Wl,-dynamic-linker
> >> -Wl,~a/~a \"$@\"~%"
> >> #:implicit-inputs? #f
> >> #:allowed-references
> >> ,@(match (%current-system)
> >> - ("powerpc-linux"
> >> + ((? target-powerpc?)
> >
> > I wonder if this would be better as ,@(if target-powerpc?
> > I didn't test to see how it would work with cross compiling, I don't
> > know if binutils-final gets built in that case.
>
> Are the final inputs ever cross-compiled? I'm having trouble thinking
> of a case when binutils-final would ever be cross-compiled. The package
> (like all the final inputs) exist specifically to provide the native GCC
> used for building the rest of the things in the system. In a case where
> you want to cross-compile e.g. GNU Hello, Guix first uses these final
> inputs to (natively) build a cross compilation toolchain, and then it
> will use that one to cross-compile GNU Hello.
>
> I don't think we need to account for cross-compliation of the final
> inputs, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
I first tried to cross compile binutils-final from x86_64 but it failed
because all the mes packages don't support powerpc yet. Then I tried
emulating an aarch64 machine to cross compile binutils-final and that
failed at make-boot0. I think we can assume that binutils-final (and the
other -final packages) aren't going to be cross compiled.
,@(if might be cleaner to look at, but ,@(match makes it easier to
make change later without worrying about nested if statements. Which
hopefully shouldn't be an issue anyway for binutils-final.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#47182] [PATCH 00/18] Add support for powerpc64le-linux (wip-ppc64le-for-master), Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16
- [bug#47182] [PATCH 05/18] gnu: gcc-boot0: Enable 128-bit long double for POWER9., Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16
- [bug#47182] [PATCH 06/18] gnu: binutils-final: Provide bash for binary on powerpc-linux., Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16
- [bug#47182] [PATCH 04/18] gnu: glibc: Fix ldd path on powerpc*., Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16
- [bug#47182] [PATCH 10/18] gnu: texlive-bin: Fix compilation on powerpc64le*., Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16
[bug#47182] [PATCH 13/18] Add powerpc64le-linux as a supported Guix architecture., Chris Marusich, 2021/03/16