guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#42736] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-doom-themes: Update to 2.1.6-5.


From: Jack Hill
Subject: [bug#42736] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-doom-themes: Update to 2.1.6-5.
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 22:09:39 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Brett Gilio wrote:


Hey Jack,

Thanks for taking time to revise this package. When I originally wrote
it I made notice to the fact that some elisp bytecompilations were
failing or not behaving appropriately. Since then I am pretty sure
hlissner has disabled the bytecompilation completely? Could you review
this for me, and if true please revise the appropriate arguments. If you
aren't sure what I am talking about, please let me know.

Brett,

I think the way forward is to follow upstream's choices and not enable or disable byte compilation in Guix.

After upstream introduced commit 9cd6872 [0], our trick to selectively leave batch compilation enabled for some files didn't work because they already had `-*- no-byte-compile: t; -*-` at the top of the file. In my testing, I added a phase to substitute this away. Indeed, this allowed our trick to work again. However, the material, snazzy, and tomorrow-day themes now have problems with byte compilation.

Therefore, I removed the disable-breaking-compilation phase entirely. With it removed, doom-themes-autoloads.el, doom-themes-base.el, doom-themes.el, doom-themes-ext-org.el, and doom-themes-ext-visual-bell.el do get byte compiled. From this evidence I concluded that upstream is aware of this issue and is only disabling byte compilation where necessary.

I'll send a version 2 of the patch with the phase removed shortly.

[0] 
https://github.com/hlissner/emacs-doom-themes/commit/9cd6872b1af88165834230abd45743036861f925

Best,
Jack





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]