[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
[bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:11:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> writes:
> 10:11 kate says: guix refresh -l emacs-direnv
> No dependents other than itself: emacs-direnv@2.0.0
>
> From 22f556d67d8ec2f548859ecd20239a859d70d102 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:09:48 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-direnv: Update to 2.1.0.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-direnv): Update to 2.1.0 and make direnv a
> propagated-input.
Thank you.
I wonder if propagating direnv is a good idea, tho.
I understand that the Emacs library is not going to be useful if direnv
is not available in user's profile. OTOH, installing this package from,
e.g., M-x list-packages, wouldn't install direnv either. Moreover,
I assume anyone installing this Emacs package would have direnv
available already.
Considering the rule of thumb is to limit propagated inputs, I suggest
to remove direnv.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2020/06/10
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2020/06/10
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Oleg Pykhalov, 2020/06/10
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2020/06/11
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Oleg Pykhalov, 2020/06/11
- [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv, Oleg Pykhalov, 2020/06/11