[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#28226] go with gccgo still relevant?
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
[bug#28226] go with gccgo still relevant? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:34:19 +0300 |
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote:
> Efraim,
>
> I cam across this old bug. Do you think it is still relevant?
>
> Best,
> Jack
Yes and no. The patches I provided didn't work as expected, but we do
want to have an alternate go implementation for architectures which
aren't supported by go-1.4.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature