[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#41735] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add openssh-no-x.
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
[bug#41735] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add openssh-no-x. |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:00:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Othacehe writes:
Hello!
> * gnu/packages/ssh.scm (openssh-no-x): New variable.
[..]
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/ssh.scm b/gnu/packages/ssh.scm
[..]
> +;; OpenSSH without X support. This allows to use OpenSSH without dragging X
> +;; libraries to the closure.
> +(define-public openssh-no-x
> + (package
> + (inherit openssh)
> + (name "openssh-no-x")
> + (inputs (alist-delete "xauth" (package-inputs openssh)))))
I like it! Maybe use -sans-x?
Two remarks: after merging, we may want to use openssh-no-x for the Hurd
too and drop this from openssh proper:
,@(if (hurd-target?)
'()
`(("xauth" ,xauth))))) ; for 'ssh -X' and 'ssh -Y'
We have this bit because xauth does not compile for the Hurd yet,
but it's kind of a kludge.
Not to hold this up and maybe we should take this discussion
elsewhere...but I have a ~5y old, bit-rotting stack of LilyPond cross
build packages (foo-SANS-X) laying around. At the time--much to my
suprise--I found the LilyPond community less than enthousiastic to move
their binary package builds to Guix (yet); but adding these -NO-X
packages felt a bit weird. So, I wonder if we could address the X'yness
of packages in a more structured way, that would be nice...
Greetings,
Janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.com