[bug#41395] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-questionary

[Edouard Klein]

Marius Bakke writes:

> Edouard Klein <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> * /gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-questionary): New variable
>> * /gnu/packages/python-check.scm (python-pytest-pycodestyle): New variable
>
> Can you submit these packages as two separate patches?
>
> [...]
>
Done

>> +(define-public python-pytest-pycodestyle
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "python-pytest-pycodestyle")
>> +    (version "2.0.0")  ;; Any version higher than that requires 
>> python-pytest~=5.4
>> +    ;; (python-pytest is at version 5.3.5 as I write this comment
>> +    ;; and 5478 packages depend on it.)
>
> You can create a 'python-pytest-5.4' variable instead of sticking to
> this old version, we'll probably need it sooner or later.  No strong
> opinion though.
>

I did not understand that pinning dependencies was also allowed for
future versions. I tried but I can't get python-pytest 5.4's tests to
pass, so I'll leave it like that for now and try to come back and
revisit that if I have some time.

> [...]
>
>> +(define-public python-questionary
>> +  (package
>> +   (name "python-questionary")
>> +   (version "1.5.2")
>> +   (source
>> +    (origin
>> +     (method url-fetch)
>> +     (uri (pypi-uri "questionary" version))
>> +     (sha256
>> +      (base32
>> +       "09n737qmvzbibl8hmbd5zfg1502fd9n0r8qjzz1y0vy8nqv1xr7n"))))
>> +   (build-system python-build-system)
>> +   (propagated-inputs
>> +    `(("python-prompt-toolkit" ,python-prompt-toolkit)))
>> +   (native-inputs
>> +    `(("python-coveralls" ,python-coveralls)
>> +      ("python-pytest-cov" ,python-pytest-cov)
>> +      ("python-pytest-pycodestyle"
>> +       ,python-pytest-pycodestyle)
>> +      ))
>
> These parens feel lonely.  :-)

I did a last minute edit and forgot to lint again, sorry :)

>
>> +   (arguments
>> +    `(#:phases
>> +      (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> +        (replace 'check
>> +          (lambda _
>> +            (invoke "py.test"))))))
>> +   (home-page "https://github.com/tmbo/questionary";)
>> +   (synopsis
>> +    "Pretty command line user prompts")
>
> The line break here is not necessary.
>
> LGTM with these changes, can you send updated patches?
>
> Thanks!

Thank you for reviewing the changes and for the suggestions :)