guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#41023: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: behave: Fix build with Python 3.8.


From: Christopher Baines
Subject: bug#41023: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: behave: Fix build with Python 3.8.
Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 15:58:04 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3

Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:

> Christopher Baines <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Add a patch based on an upstream commit [1].
>>
>> 1: c000c88eb5239b87f299c85e83b349b0ef387ae7
>>
>> * gnu/packages/patches/behave-skip-a-couple-of-tests.patch: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>> * gnu/packages/check.scm (behave)[source]: Use the patch.
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/behave-skip-a-couple-of-tests.patch 
>> b/gnu/packages/patches/behave-skip-a-couple-of-tests.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..4985f34425
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/behave-skip-a-couple-of-tests.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
>> +From c000c88eb5239b87f299c85e83b349b0ef387ae7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From: jenisys <address@hidden>
>> +Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 12:43:19 +0200
>> +Subject: [PATCH] FIX: python3.8 regressions on CI server
>> +
>> +Issues w/ python3.8:
>> +* Traceback: Line numbers of step functions differ (+1)
>> +* JUnit XML: Attribute ordering of XML element differs (in output)
>> +---
>> + behave.ini                            |  3 +-
>> + features/environment.py               | 14 ++++++
>> + features/step.duplicated_step.feature | 20 ++++----
>> + issue.features/environment.py         | 38 ++++++++++++---
>> + issue.features/issue0330.feature      | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> + issue.features/issue0446.feature      | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> + issue.features/issue0457.feature      | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>> + tox.ini                               |  2 +-
>> + 8 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Same comment as the previous review.  These statistics are not useful,
> but describing the issue and linking to the upstream resources is.

I've tweaked the top of the patch file now.

> Due to the sheer size of the patch, consider using an origin instead of
> copying it into the Guix repository.

Unfortunately the patch isn't exactly the same as the upstream commit,
as I had to tweak it in one place to get it to apply.

I've gone ahead and pushed this as
a8cb1e72ef351330d1521833c1b270dcc0da593f now.

Thanks for taking a look :)

Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]