[bug#41010] Upgrade Oil to 0.8.pre4

[Ryan Prior]

Tobias, thank you for the quick and thorough review! I've attached updated 
patches.

A little context on how this patch came to be might make some of my choices a 
little less mysterious: I didn't actually start with the original package 
definition, because I didn't realize oil was already packaged in Guix. (I 
searched for "osh", not "oil-shell")

So I wrote my own package, went to find where to put it in the guix source 
tree, found the existing package, and then kinda merged them together.



On Friday, May 1, 2020 11:23 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden> wrote:

> However, please do build and test patches before submitting them.

Done! I test my packages mostly by running `guix build -f mypackage.scm` so I 
had to figure out how to build it in the context of the source tree.

> Add a full stop after commit summaries, and a ‘change log’ entry as commit 
> body:

Added.

> OTOH a one-line link to that thread, if one exists, would be preferable.

Changed to a one-line link.

> Where do they recommend this? It's nice to have a link in case the 
> recommendation changes.

Added a link to the recommendation.


> …as ‘guix gc --references oil’ (and readline's general nature) tell us, 
> that's not the case here: Oil links to it at run time, so it must not be 
> native.

I changed it to a normal input.

> Both the original synopsis and description are much better. If certain things 
> are no longer accurate they can be adjusted but this is just upstream's 
> marketing pitch.

I did ask upstream what they'd want as a synopsis/description. I updated it to 
be more similar to the original but edited for accuracy.

>
> > -   (license (list license:psfl ; Tarball vendors python2.7
>
> Hmm, this doesn't parse as English (it's missing a verb). I'd guess typo… but 
> for what? Are upstream the ‘tarball vendors’ here? What was wrong with the 
> original comment?

In some software development circles, we do use "vendor" as a verb. Sorry for 
the confusion!

>vendor (third-person singular simple present vendors, present participle 
>vendoring, simple past and past participle vendored)
>
>    (transitive, software development) To bundle third-party dependencies with 
> the source code for one's own program.
>
>        I distributed my application with a vendored copy of Perl so that it 
> wouldn't use the system copies of Perl where it is installed.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vendor

In favor of readability I changed the verb to "includes."

> Phew. ‘I'll just review this trivial bump before bed-time.’ This patch 
> changes lots of things for one small package. I hope you don't mind lots of 
> comments :-)

Thank you again, I appreciated all the comments!

Sincerely,
Ryan

0001-gnu-oil-Update-to-0.8.pre4.patch
Description: Text Data

0001-gnu-oil-shell-Rename-to-oil-and-add-a-deprecated-ali.patch
Description: Text Data