[bug#28594] nototools (required for building Noto from source)

[Christopher Baines]

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:23:19 +0000
ng0 <address@hidden> wrote:

> Christopher Baines transcribed 4.7K bytes:
> > On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 18:47:37 +0000
> > ng0 <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> > > * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (nototools): New variable.
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/fontutils.scm | 44
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 43
> > > insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm
> > > b/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm index 15401f652..ca10c10b0 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > >  ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Efraim Flashner
> > > <address@hidden> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Rene Saavedra
> > > <address@hidden> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Leo Famulari
> > > <address@hidden> +;;; Copyright © 2017 ng0
> > > <address@hidden> ;;;
> > >  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> > >  ;;;
> > > @@ -44,7 +45,8 @@
> > >    #:use-module (guix svn-download)
> > >    #:use-module (guix git-download)
> > >    #:use-module (guix build-system cmake)
> > > -  #:use-module (guix build-system gnu))
> > > +  #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
> > > +  #:use-module (guix build-system python))
> > >  
> > >  (define-public freetype
> > >    (package
> > > @@ -565,3 +567,43 @@ opentype fonts.  You can save fonts in many
> > > different outline formats, and generate bitmaps.")
> > >     (license license:gpl3+)
> > >     (home-page "https://fontforge.github.io/en-US/";)))
> > > +
> > > +(define-public nototools
> > > +  (package
> > > +    (name "nototools")
> > > +    (version "20170925")
> > > +    (source
> > > +     (origin
> > > +       (method url-fetch)
> > > +       (uri (string-append
> > > "https://github.com/googlei18n/nototools/";
> > > +
> > > "archive/v2017-09-25-tooling-for-phase3-"
> > > +                           "update.tar.gz"))
> > > +       (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
> > > +       (sha256
> > > +        (base32
> > > +
> > > "1pvacw18cm9l4sb66pqyjc7hc74xhhfxc7kd5ald8lixf4wzg0s8"))))
> > > +    (build-system python-build-system)
> > > +    (arguments
> > > +     `(#:python ,python-2))
> > > +    (propagated-inputs
> > > +     `(("python2-booleanoperations" ,python2-booleanoperations)
> > > +       ("python2-defcon" ,python2-defcon)
> > > +       ("python2-fonttools" ,python2-fonttools)
> > > +       ("python2-pillow" ,python2-pillow)
> > > +       ("python2-pyclipper" ,python2-pyclipper)
> > > +       ("python2-ufolib" ,python2-ufolib)))
> > > +    (home-page "https://github.com/googlei18n/nototools";)
> > > +    (synopsis "Noto fonts support tools and scripts")
> > > +    (description
> > > +     "Nototools is a python package containing python scripts
> > > used to +maintain the Noto Fonts project.")
> > > +    (license (list license:asl2.0
> > > +                   ;; Sample texts are attributed to UN and
> > > OHCHR.
> > > +                   ;; The permissions on the UDHR are pretty lax:
> > > +                   ;;
> > > http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/Introduction.aspx
> > > +                   ;; "If UDHR translations or materials are
> > > reproduced, users
> > > +                   ;; should make reference to this website as a
> > > source by
> > > +                   ;; providing a link."
> > > +                   license:public-domain
> > > +                   license:non-copyleft
> > > "file://sample_texts/attributions.txt"
> > > +                   "See sample_texts/attributions.txt in the
> > > distribution."))))  
> > 
> > This whole patchset looks pretty good to me. I've built all the
> > packages, but haven't tested them.
> > 
> > guix lint has one complaint here about the license:
> > 
> > gnu/packages/fontutils.scm:591:13: address@hidden: invalid
> > license field
> > 
> > I'm not quite sure what this means.  
> 
> I think I know it, the non-copyleft needs to be adjusted to the list.
> Thanks. I really should run lint for longer patchseries. I admit I do
> this not very often.
> Thanks for your review.

You're welcome :)

It looks to me like the python-fonttools patch could be merged now,
shall I merge it? I only ask as I don't want to mess up your workflow?

pgpA2R3hD65j6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature