[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#28616] disable failing bluez test
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#28616] disable failing bluez test |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:23:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On 11 October 2017 18:10:58 CEST, Thomas Danckaert <address@hidden> wrote:
>From: Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: [bug#28616] disable failing bluez test
>Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:40:39 +0200
>
>> Thomas Danckaert <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> From: Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
>>> Subject: Re: [bug#28616] disable failing bluez test
>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 23:50:56 +0200
>>>
>>>> I think we should apply the patch regardless (on 'core-updates'),
>with a
>>>> link to the upstream discussion. IMO it's more important to be
>able to
>>>> build from source regardless of hardware, than running this one
>unit
>>>> test. What do you think?
>>>
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>> I'll push this to core-updates then.
>>
>> On second thought, "bluez" is currently failing on armhf, seemingly
>due
>> to the original patch:
><https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2304811/nixlog/4/raw>
>
>I believe attached patch does the job for master, just touching armhf
>and leaving other architectures alone. I tested it by replacing
>armhf-linux with x86_64-linux, and then it skips the test ...
>
>WDYT?
Yay! I am unable to test it right now, but if you've verified that this doesn't
change the derivation on other architectures this LGTM.
Thank you!
PS: feel free to merge it to core-updates after pushing and modify it to apply
on all arches there. If you're not comfortable I can do this later.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
bug#28616: disable failing bluez test, Thomas Danckaert, 2017/10/07