[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober. |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:05:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Heya,
Arun Isaac <address@hidden> skribis:
> Here's an updated patch.
>
>> + (replace 'install
>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (define (find-files-non-recursive directory)
>> + (find-files directory
>> + (lambda (file stat)
>> + (string-match (string-append "^" directory
>> "/[^/]*$")
>> + file))
>> + #:directories? #t))
>
> Do you think it would be a good idea to add a #:recursive? keyword
> argument to `find-files' in (guix build utils), instead of creating this
> `find-files-non-recursive-function' here?
Hmm I didn’t understand that it *had* to be non-recursive. Does it
really make a difference?
If it does, then ‘scandir’ from (ice-9 ftw) would be the thing. Sorry
if I led you in the wrong direction. :-/
>> + (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> + (bin (string-append out "/bin"))
>> + (lib (string-append out "/lib"))
>> + (share (string-append out "/share")))
>> + (for-each (cut install-file <> bin)
>> + (list "linux-boot-prober" "os-prober"))
>> + (install-file "newns" (string-append lib "/os-prober"))
>> + (install-file "common.sh" (string-append share "/os-prober"))
>> + (install-file "os-probes/mounted/powerpc/20macosx"
>> + (string-append lib "/os-probes/mounted"))
>> + (for-each
>> + (lambda (directory)
>> + (for-each
>> + (lambda (file)
>> + (let ((destination (string-append lib "/" directory
>> + "/" (basename
>> file))))
>> + (mkdir-p (dirname destination))
>> + (copy-recursively file destination)))
>> + (append (find-files-non-recursive (string-append
>> directory "/common"))
>> + (find-files-non-recursive (string-append
>> directory "/x86")))))
>> + (list "os-probes" "os-probes/mounted" "os-probes/init"
>> + "linux-boot-probes" "linux-boot-probes/mounted"))
>> + #t))))))
>
> I have used `find-files' instead of `ftw', as you suggested. The install
> procedure is clearer now. but still remains quite messy. It is not
> simple enough to separate the "candidate-files" and "install-file"
> logic.
>
> WDYT? Will the above code do?
Sure. I mean, we should try our best to make things clearer, while not
losing our hairs on it. Sometimes it just has to be messy.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/09
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/09
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober.,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/10
- Message not available
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/10
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/10
- Message not available
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/11
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/11
- Message not available
- [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/11
- bug#28281: [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober., Arun Isaac, 2017/09/13