[bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax.

[Kei Kebreau]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hello,
>
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> The patches are in working order. The first patch would cause 1200
>>> rebuilds, but the second would only cause 128 rebuilds. Should I work on
>>> splitting up the first patch into pieces that Hydra can handle under its
>>> current load?
>>
>> I'm not actually sure what's best here.  It may be easiest to just throw
>> them both at 'staging' and accept the (hopefully few) merge conflicts.
>>
>> Ludo, any preference?
>
> The one that causes 128 rebuilds could go to ‘master’ (which is a good
> thing: we won’t have conflicts with this part of the changes.)

I've committed the 128-rebuild patch to the master branch.

>
> The rest could go to ‘staging’ I suppose.
>
>> If we're going staging, let's try to coordinate it so that we can start
>> it shortly after adding them.  Maybe midnight tomorrow or Saturday UTC?
>> I have a few other updates in my queue that haven't been pushed yet.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.  I’ll let you coordinate.  :-)
>

Marius, send me an email when you're ready!

> Thanks for taking care of this!
>

:-)

> Ludo’.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature