[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#27898] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Put autoconf-related phases immediately aft
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
[bug#27898] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Put autoconf-related phases immediately after the 'unpack phase. |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:44:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:31:08PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > I guess there is a correct ordering and an incorrect ordering, depending
> > on whether or not these phases should happen before or after the shebang
> > patching phases. Does it work if it happens before the shebangs are
> > patched?
>
> What does the "it" in "does it work" mean here? If you mean the
> builds themselves, then no. Success isn't guaranteed because the
> configure scripts might not be patched, as the patching phases are
> finished before the "build" phases. This change ensures that the
> "patch-usr-bin-file" phase can operate on generated configure scripts if
> necessary:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-07/msg00124.html
I'm sorry for sending that confusing sentence! You interpreted it
correctly. Thank for the clarification!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Marius Bakke, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Leo Famulari, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Marius Bakke, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Kei Kebreau, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Leo Famulari, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Marius Bakke, 2017/08/02
- [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Marius Bakke, 2017/08/02
[bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Marius Bakke, 2017/08/27
[bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax., Kei Kebreau, 2017/08/28