[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1.
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:31:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Roel Janssen <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Roel Janssen <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1.
>>> ---
>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644
>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.")
>>> (define glib
>>> (package
>>> (name "glib")
>>> - (version "2.50.3")
>>> + (version "2.52.1")
>>> (source (origin
>>> (method url-fetch)
>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/"
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.")
>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz"))
>>> (sha256
>>> (base32
>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2"))
>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l"))
>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch"))))
>>> (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything
>>> --
>>> 2.12.1
>>>
>>> Dear Guix,
>>>
>>> Is it OK to update glib?
>>
>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we
>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up
>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too
>> much for "staging". What do you think?
>>
>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html
>
> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME
> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we
> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;)
>
> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's
> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the
> Git repository and do the builds locally?
I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :)
`./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of
it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and
see how it goes :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/16
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Marius Bakke, 2017/04/16
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/17
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1.,
Marius Bakke <=
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/17
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Marius Bakke, 2017/04/17
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Kei Kebreau, 2017/04/23
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/24
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/24
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Kei Kebreau, 2017/04/27
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Marius Bakke, 2017/04/27
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Kei Kebreau, 2017/04/27
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Roel Janssen, 2017/04/28
- bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1., Kei Kebreau, 2017/04/28