[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatically testing package updates
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Automatically testing package updates |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2024 00:46:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
> Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name> writes:
>
>> sidenote: as a newcomer i found it rather off-putting that the bug
>> tracker is full of random two-liner package updates, many long
>> forgotten and even obsolete.
>
> This is exactly my point and why I think the bug tracker must contain
> only *actionable* work that humans are meant to work on. As we're
> trying to undo the damage of years of being overwhelmed by patches I'd
> really like to keep the issue tracker for humans only.
I wonder what level of human validation we’d want for “trivial updates”.
In Nixpkgs, IIUC, a bot submits pull requests and a human being
eventually clicks the merge button.
Ludo’.
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, (continued)
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Simon Tournier, 2024/12/02
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Efraim Flashner, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Suhail Singh, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Ricardo Wurmus, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Suhail Singh, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Attila Lendvai, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Ricardo Wurmus, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Suhail Singh, 2024/12/06
- Re: Automatically testing package updates,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Suhail Singh, 2024/12/05
- Re: Automatically testing package updates, Ricardo Wurmus, 2024/12/05
Re: Automatically testing package updates, Vagrant Cascadian, 2024/12/02
Re: Re: Automatically testing package updates, Sharlatan Hellseher, 2024/12/03