Re: Regarding the vertical alignment in the record definitions

[indieterminacy]

Hello,

On 2024-12-05 07:13, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> ...
>
> I agree it's a bit tedious, both manually and also in diffs.  My
> personal preference is to leave just one space between the field name
> and the value, that also holds for variable bounds in lets, etc., to
> avoid the problem (at the cost of some visual clarity, I guess).
>
> One day maybe we'll have a general tool like 'scheme-fmt' to run on a
> file save hook that'd fix the format question for good, like Python has
> with 'black' or 'ruff', etc.  I have on mind to work on such a tool, 
> but
> it's low in the list.

FWIW, Im slowly cobbling together some parsing-expression-grammars for 
Guix package definitions.
Im doing it in the Lisp TXR atm but Im going to create a hybrid approach 
with Prolog to make it more general.

In addition to outputting a unified formatting, Im planning on altering 
descriptions so that that that content is outputted in the format 
Texinfo.

Please dont expect anything soon but should anybody start any other 
initiative then I may possibly some useful assets or details by then.

Kind regards,


Jonathan