[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifac
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:57:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@elenq.tech> skribis:
> On 2024-04-04 21:48, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>> all in all, just by following my gut insctincts, i was advodating
>> for building everything from git even before the exposure of this
>> backdoor. in fact, i found it surprising as a guix newbie that not
>> everything is built from git (or their VCS of choice).
>
> That has happened to me too.
> Why not use Git directly always?
Because it create{s,d} a bootstrapping issue. The
“builtin:git-download” method was added only recently to guix-daemon and
cannot be assumed to be available yet:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65866
> In the bootstrapping it's also a problem, as all those tools
> (autotools) must be bootstrapped, and they require other programs
> (compilers) that actually use them. And we'll be forced to use git,
> too, or at least clone the bootstrapping repos, git-archive them
> ourselves and host them properly signed. At least, we could challenge
> them using git (similar to what we do with the substitutes), which we
> cannot do right now with the release tarballs against the actual code
> of the repository.
I think we should gradually move to building everything from
source—i.e., fetching code from VCS and adding Autoconf & co. as inputs.
This has been suggested several times before. The difficulty, as you
point out, will lie in addressing bootstrapping issues with core
packages: glibc, GCC, Binutils, Coreutils, etc. I’m not sure how to do
that but…
> In live-bootstrap they just write the build scripts by hand, and
> ignore whatever the ./configure script says. That's also a reasonable
> way to tackle the bootstrapping, but it's a hard one. Thankfully, we
> are working together in this Bootstrapping effort so we can learn from
> them and adapt their recipes to our Guix commencement.scm module. This
> would be some effort, but it's actually doable.
… live-bootstrap can probably be a good source of inspiration to find a
way to build those core packages (or some of them) straight from a VCS
checkout. And here the trick will be to find a way to do that in a
concise and maintainable way (generating config.h and Makefiles by hand
may prove unmaintainable in practice.)
Ludo’.
- backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2024/04/04
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Attila Lendvai, 2024/04/04
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2024/04/04
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Attila Lendvai, 2024/04/04
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Ekaitz Zarraga, 2024/04/04
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils),
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Andreas Enge, 2024/04/11
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Ekaitz Zarraga, 2024/04/11
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Andreas Enge, 2024/04/11
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Ekaitz Zarraga, 2024/04/11
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2024/04/13
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Skyler Ferris, 2024/04/13
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2024/04/13
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Skyler Ferris, 2024/04/14
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Skyler Ferris, 2024/04/13
- Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils), Ludovic Courtès, 2024/04/19