Re: Emacs next variants

[Cayetano Santos]

>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 19:14, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 17:59, John Kehayias
> <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> During this discussion some changes were made to this inheritance structure 
>> in
>>
>> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=b4c64ddce44bb31332784c3f8e037bd565194604>
>>
>> and
>>
>> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=070c335a91d5c245f0360e12c794e9109f9faaf1>
>
> Thanks for pointing that.  From my understanding, it does not change
> what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built using
> '--with-pgtk'.  In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter is built
> using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with tree-sitter
> *and* pgtk support.
>
> Cheers,
> simon

As for the NEWS-29 file:

"Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as
undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard input of
sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'."

C.