Re: A real-life test of long-term reproducibility

[zimoun]

Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 02 Sep 2022 at 15:17, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Here you would need ‘--allow-downgrades’.

Maybe time-machine could advertise of this option?


Well aside, it can be indeed confusing that the version-1.x branch does
not match the tag v1.x; I understand why.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ git log --graph --format="%h %s %d" v1.0.0^..origin/version-1.0.0
* 48aa30ce73 build: Add 'doc/build.scm' to build on-line copies of the manual.  
(origin/version-1.0.0)
* adf577dcc4 doc: Update htmlxref.cnf. 
* 1a9fc8e228 doc: Warn about missing entries in htmlxref.cnf. 
* 2921b6a611 doc: Adjust cross-references for GNU triplets. 
* 3aa11dfbed doc: Provide the actual URL to the VM image. 
* 542e7fb57f doc: Add note about <https://bugs.gnu.org/35541>. 
* 3a3e9f2bb5 guix-install.sh: Update URL. 
* 9c941364bf vm: Build ISOs and VM images in a UTF-8 environment. 
* 17acc215bf gnu: guix: Update to 326dcbf. 
* 326dcbf1b3 gnu: guix: Update to 1.0.0. 
* 6298c3ffd9 Update NEWS.  (tag: v1.0.0)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Does it make sense to document it?  And does it make sense to merge to
master right after 326dcbf1b3?  And not after some commits:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ for i in $(seq 0 3); do \
   git log --graph --format="%h %s %d" v1.$i.0^..origin/version-1.$i.0 \
   | wc -l ;done   
11
6
warning: refname 'v1.2.0' is ambiguous.
10
7
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---



Cheers,
simon