Re: Reproducibility of "core" packages in GNU Guix

[zimoun]

Hi Vagrant,

Cool to see these reports.


On Mon, 02 May 2022 at 06:11, Vagrant Cascadian 
<vagrant@reproducible-builds.org> wrote:

> $ guix challenge --diff=none $(cat guix-base-set)
>
> /gnu/store/8gmqvwf0ccqfyimficcnhxvrykwx6y8g-linux-libre-5.17.5 contents 
> differ:
>   no local build for 
> '/gnu/store/8gmqvwf0ccqfyimficcnhxvrykwx6y8g-linux-libre-5.17.5'
>   
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/zstd/8gmqvwf0ccqfyimficcnhxvrykwx6y8g-linux-libre-5.17.5:
>  19rg55v51wliy9v30sm82f38rxm1lqjpfqs6r63ikb3vklnj0pnw
>   
> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/8gmqvwf0ccqfyimficcnhxvrykwx6y8g-linux-libre-5.17.5:
>  14fax6g9sx7qj64z73hrh8ydlbv6kxzhd1hbyqz7v0ra51bprv1k
> /gnu/store/7qz2jlghm4gc87jww5j24c5mcip0whzy-keyutils-1.6.3 contents differ:
>   no local build for 
> '/gnu/store/7qz2jlghm4gc87jww5j24c5mcip0whzy-keyutils-1.6.3'
>   
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/7qz2jlghm4gc87jww5j24c5mcip0whzy-keyutils-1.6.3:
>  1sag2bq9kbp5np3fpakyi4xg96kxq5xwbb7ib4hamx2bqh6vscr9
>   
> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/7qz2jlghm4gc87jww5j24c5mcip0whzy-keyutils-1.6.3:
>  07ln4fqgvg0ag2d881xhgdw2h3m1lqzs6xlac8p7rz2rgx0wx1yr
> /gnu/store/ajw8nnrnd6hr183skwqdgc8c7mazg97h-isl-0.23 contents differ:
>   no local build for '/gnu/store/ajw8nnrnd6hr183skwqdgc8c7mazg97h-isl-0.23'
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/ajw8nnrnd6hr183skwqdgc8c7mazg97h-isl-0.23: 
> 03a180af1my7lmsnig01qhrirxa2fp7j052jw9kv5ff4i6ya7fh4
>   
> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/ajw8nnrnd6hr183skwqdgc8c7mazg97h-isl-0.23:
>  1j24gc6ysa9d3z4hq6lsxvdik94ddb7nj93krv7cs5lmbmjwmqw7
> /gnu/store/45b6181w68a3lprx9m6riwgyinw3y145-guix-1.3.0-25.c1719a0 contents 
> differ:
>   no local build for 
> '/gnu/store/45b6181w68a3lprx9m6riwgyinw3y145-guix-1.3.0-25.c1719a0'
>   
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/45b6181w68a3lprx9m6riwgyinw3y145-guix-1.3.0-25.c1719a0:
>  0p7lhfxcx7bfjfwlyrp6h5j9fcyzswyj2wkbnhcd3fgxm5swdi6c
>   
> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/45b6181w68a3lprx9m6riwgyinw3y145-guix-1.3.0-25.c1719a0:
>  0yfpcsmvbnzw0vpjrjwwrjih4ss3yvk7cy4k6ibdpsn7dcx9kw2c
> /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8 contents differ:
>   no local build for '/gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8'
>   
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8:
>  0vppx6fk1a7gvk9ccz9ma992w1h5bhfk535acddrnkhyrk92z5ln
>   
> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8:
>  05w5i5zq1k1avqx2gqxnqynn5lmdizis9babk34dkmnazb3h77kb
>
> 47 store items were analyzed:
>   - 42 (89.4%) were identical
>   - 5 (10.6%) differed
>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

[...]

> The fact that the guix and guile packages do not build reproducibly is a
> little disappointing as they're both so central to guix itself; I
> suspect parallelism triggers those reproducibility issues(from
> experience with Debian), though that may just reveal other issue in
> guile itself.

About Guix, probably bug#44835 [1] for one, I guess.  And note this old
Guile bug#20272 [2] for two, which implies unreproducible Guix.

1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44835>
2: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/20272>


Cheers,
simon