[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarifying blog post licensing
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Clarifying blog post licensing |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:57:00 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great
Good catch, I agree!
Janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
- Clarifying blog post licensing, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Manolis Ragkousis, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Efraim Flashner, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Julien Lepiller, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, Vagrant Cascadian, 2022/01/26
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2022/01/27
- Re: Clarifying blog post licensing, jbranso, 2022/01/29