guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Merging wip-guix-home to master


From: Andrew Tropin
Subject: Re: Merging wip-guix-home to master
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:11:46 +0300

On 2021-09-29 13:39, Xinglu Chen wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
>> On 2021-09-24 15:38, Xinglu Chen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>>>
>>>> The core part of Guix Home project has been moved from rde
>>>> repository[fn:1] to wip-guix-home branch of guix repository.
>>>>
>>>> I'm about a week on wip-guix-home branch completely and Guix Home works
>>>> fine.  There are no any major issues on rde-devel and guix-devel mailing
>>>> lists and it seems that branch is ready to be merged.
>>>>
>>>> My guix describe looks like:
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> Generation 114     Sep 17 2021 13:33:55    (current)
>>>>   rde 31f8003
>>>>     repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde
>>>>     branch: without-guix-home
>>>>     commit: 31f800353a781cef25fc80c05ad824a068a049c8
>>>>   guix a2324d8
>>>>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>>>>     branch: wip-guix-home
>>>>     commit: a2324d8b56eabf8117bca220a507cc791edffd2e
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a discussion[fn:2] on moving home services to (gnu services
>>>> ...)  modules, which is likely to happen, but it's possible to do the
>>>> migration relatively painless by re-exporting necessary symbols in
>>>> (gnu home-services ...) at first and removing them completely later.
>>>>
>>>> Another important part of the work related to Guix Home project is
>>>> covering related modules and cli with tests, but it can be done in
>>>> parallel and is not a blocker for merging.
>>>
>>> I noticed that the ‘guix home import’ subcommand is included, but I
>>> think it needs more thought and feedback from people before it makes its
>>> way into ‘master’; it also seems to lack documentation.
>>>
>>> I just realized that it generates the following service declaration
>>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> (service
>>>  home-bash-service-type
>>>  (home-bash-configuration
>>>   (bashrc
>>>    (list (slurp-file-gexp
>>>           (local-file "/home/yoctocell/.bashrc"))))))
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> but when running ‘guix home reconfigure’, the ~/.bashrc file will be
>>> moved, so when running ‘guix home reconfigure’ for the second time, it
>>> would read the ~/.bashrc which is itself a symlink to a file the store.
>>> ‘guix home import’ clearly isn’t in a usable state as of right now…
>>
>> Yep, I remember that it is not documented.  I think it's ok for
>> generating a simple sample configuration,

It was two independent sentences.

>
> I disagree, I think it’s OK for things like (guix git), which are mainly
> used by developers, to not be documented in the manual.  Ideally, the
> all the modules would be documented.  :-)
>
> However, ‘guix home import’ will be used by developers and regular
> users, and documenting the command should be a requirement.
>
>> but I agree that it's not yet complete, if you wish I'll disable it in
>> cli.
>
> I have sent a few patches to fix it and document it[1], so it should
> probably left as-is for now.
>
>> Just an idea for the future: it's probably better to copy .bashrc to the
>> current directory and do (local-file "./bashrc").
>
> This wouldn’t work if the user doesn’t have write-access to the current
> directory, nor if the current directory is $HOME.  I think it’s better
> for the user to specify the directory themselves.
>
> [1]: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50873>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]