Re: On the naming of System and Home services modules.

[pinoaffe]

Andrew Tropin writes:
> Even if it would be possible, still don't see too much cases, where the
> system service is wanted to be used as home service and vice versa.

I think that a bunch of the current system services are basically "run
server <x> user <y>" or "run server <x> as its own user", those might
also be useful as home services (if I'm understanding the notion of home
services correctly).