[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:57:04 -0400 |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:35:21PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> 1) To know how old the package's source code is
Oh, some more thoughts:
What about extending `guix refresh` to help with your use case, assuming
that it doesn't already?
And what about packages that aren't based on VCS, but on tarballs / zip
files? Do those need a timestamp too?
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/02
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/02
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/04
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/08