Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Getting rid of input labels?

[Maxime Devos]

Ludovic Courtès schreef op wo 26-05-2021 om 15:43 [+0200]:
> Hi Maxime,
>[...]
> In many cases, you don’t need the ability to refer to a specific input;
> you just need all the inputs to contribute to search path environment
> variables, and that’s enough.  A “label collision” does not matter at
> all in this case.
> 
> In some cases, you do need to refer to a specific input, as in:
> 
> [...]

> In this case, there are now two options:
> 
>   1. Arrange so that label is unique among your inputs, as is already
>      the case.
> 
>   2. [...]
>
> Do you think there are unaddressed issues with go-ipfs-migrations?

As long as there remains a possibility of overriding the ‘default‘ label
generated from the package name, then everything seems ok for the
(not-yet-packaged) go-ipfs-migrations. This appears to remain the case,
so ok?

Greetings,
Maxime.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part